The Great College Lie

If you want to be successful you need to go to college. Without a college degree you’re destined to work at an unsatisfying, low paying job the rest of your life and will never be able to live the American Dream. Does that advice sound familiar? It should.

That’s the mantra of success preached from the time our children enter school. They’re told that a college education will be the best investment they can ever make. Educators tell them if they don’t have a college degree, they’ll end up digging ditches or performing other menial jobs and live in poverty and misery for the rest of their lives.

Parents reinforce this message by prodding their children to get good grades so a university will give them a scholarship. Popular entertainment depicts numerous stories of a brilliant kid growing up in a working class neighborhood with less-than-successful parents who tell their kid the only way out of the hell hole is to go to college.

The problem with this assumption is that it’s wrong.

A college degree does not ensure that anyone will be successful or have a comfortable lifestyle. Conversely the absence of a degree does not mean that one is destined to low-paying, menial work. Yet the importance of a college education has been drilled in our heads often enough that seven out of ten high school students will enroll in college not because it’s in their best interest to do so, but because they’ve been told (and in some cases pressured) by parents, educators, and councilors that college is the only way to obtain the American Dream.

This advice is often backed up with the statistics that show that college graduates earn more over their lifetime than their non-college counterparts. Pope Center Researcher George Leef notes in The Overselling of Higher Education, such statistics are not only misleading but assume that those without college degrees would secure better, higher-paying employment if they obtained a college degree. Leef writes:

Instead of looking at average earnings for each group – which inflates the earnings of the college-educated by including many fabulously wealthy professionals and business executives, while depressing the earnings of those without college degrees by including many individual who are scarcely literate – it is more sensible to focus on the workers at the margin. The right question to ask is this: For high school graduates who might have gone to college but did not, is it the case that their earnings would be significantly higher if they had instead enrolled in college?

Leef concludes that students who decide not to attend college are better off not going because they can hone their skills in a non-college environment as opposed to wasting their time doing things such as studying or writing papers when their interests do not lie in that direction.

Even among those with college degrees a well-paying, satisfying job never materializes. Again Leef writes that many college graduates find themselves with no marketable skills upon graduation and only marginally employed.

Services must be rendered. Some of those jobs demand a high degree of knowledge and skill, but most don’t. With burgeoning numbers of college graduates, we should not be surprised to find that many of them – especially those who obtained easy, low-effort degrees in soft subjects – can do no better in the job market than delivering pizza, selling coffee, or taking theater tickets.

No doubt many of these people are disillusioned after being told that their college degree was their ticket to success.

Not everyone is college material. This isn’t a bad thing. Just because someone opts not to attend college doesn’t mean they’re stupid or unable to become successful. Yet we tend to look down upon those who haven’t jumped through enough hoops to obtain a college degree. Someone may be able to understand the complexities of an automobile and quickly diagnose and fix the problem but because they have a technical certificate rather than a college diploma, we don’t view them as intelligent or successful as someone who works in a small cubicle staring at a computer screen all day.

This condescending view of some professions has led to the gradual decline in interest in technical training and a void in such professions as auto and aviation mechanics, electronics, and trades such as construction.

Fortunately, vocational schools and other training have received somewhat of a resurgence in popularity. And they’re focusing on more forward-looking careers than their traditional wood or metal shop days. Technical education can now provide careers in high demand and specialized fields like robotics, 3-D animation, and industrial maintenance technology. Many of these jobs pay very well. The Christian Science Monitor tells the story of a savvy student who pursued specialized computer classes in high school and landed a $52,000 a year after graduation. The student is doing something that he loves and being paid well to do it. No college degree required.

We do our children a profound a disservice when we reflexively assume that college is the only way to achieve success. Rather, parents and educators should help children and students focus on their interests, talents, and unique abilities in order to decide what kind of post-high school education would be most beneficial. College is a good path for many people, but others would be much better off attending a vocational school, learning a trade, or starting their own business.

Continually obtaining knowledge and skills are important and necessary to do what we love with our lives and to provide for ourselves and families – if we have them. But assuming the only way to obtain success is through college merely encourages many young adults to waste years of their life pursuing something that will ultimately be of no benefit to them.

Death Warmed Over

Is it just me, or is Phil Spector one creepy looking dude?

I thought when you went on trail it was the job of lawyers to make you look presentable so the jury wouldn’t judge you by your looks. Maybe they thought the big hair he used to have was a big distraction. His new look is something between death warmed over and the Emperor from Star Wars with a girlish haircut.

Were I on the jury I’d be tempted to vote to convict just on the fact his new look makes him look like a creepy killer. His big hair, although weird, at least seemd to fit the image of musician/songwriter/record producer -- not a killer.

LOST: D.O.C

 

*** Spoiler Alert ***

Did anyone really thing that Sun was carrying someone other than Jin’s baby? If women who conceive off the island live, then where’s the tension about wondering when Sun’s going to die? And having viewers wonder what’s going to happen to Sun is much more dramatic then seeing how Jin would react to Sun telling him that the baby wasn’t his. Now the writers have something they can tease not only through the end of this season but probably through most of Season 4 too.

Sun and Jin’s flashbacks are still my favorite. To me their relationship has the most depth and emotion off all characters on the island. They could do a whole spin-off series on them before they came to the island which I think would be absolutely fascinating. The writers do a great job making their characters real and believable.

In an episode that was full of three twists, I think the biggest one was the fact that Mikhail (eye patch guy) was still alive. Maybe he knew the sonic barrier wouldn’t kill him and that was part of the reason he thanked Locke for pushing him into it. Now that I think about it, his body wasn’t lying around when Kate and Juliet fended off the smoke monster a couple of episodes back. (And speaking of the smoke monster, Vickie asked a couple weeks ago why the smoke monster couldn’t just go over the sonic barrier fence. If you listen to the official LOST podcast from April 16 the executive producers hint that the smoke monster can’t leave the ground through they didn’t explain any more than that.)

In any case I think the eye patch guy is going to play a major role in future episodes. And I have a good idea where he was going at the end of the episode. While helping save Naomi’s (the parachute lady) life she said something that Mikhail incorrectly translated at “Thank you for saving my life.” According to one source she was speaking Portuguese with a Brazilian accent really saying “I am not alone” or “I’m not the only one.” Dollars for doughnuts he’s off to find the other person who was accompanying her. (Penny, perhaps?)

As for why she believes no one survived Oceanic flight 815 – well that’s a puzzle I’d really like to know the answer.

Season 3 is getting better and better. I’m really looking forward to the remaining episodes.

Stopping Acts of Evil

It’s been interesting to watch the “astonishment” and “outrage” of journalists once the learned the State of Virginia couldn’t force Seung-Hui Cho to receive treatment until he hurt himself or someone else. They generally seem to be of the same opinion that something should have been done 17 months ago that might have prevented the slaying of 32 people. Well something was done.

A few Virginia Tech students and faculty tried to intervene on Cho's behalf 17 months ago, when they reported incidents of stalking, bizarre classroom behavior and a threat of suicide to campus police. Virginia Tech security took Cho, voluntarily, to an off-campus mental health agency. A counselor there recommended commitment and a temporary detention order was signed, indicating that Cho presented an "imminent danger" to himself.

According to official court documents, however, after evaluation at Carilion St. Albans Psychiatric Hospital, a doctor wrote that Cho, although mentally ill, "denies suicidal ideation (and) does not acknowledge symptoms of a thought disorder."

Under Virginia law, anyone seeking to forcibly commit someone to a psychiatric facility must appear before a special justice. Because St. Albans did not believe Cho presented an imminent danger, the magistrate declined to commit the Virginia Tech English major, and he was released with the understanding he would get outpatient treatment.

Maybe if they had found a gun on Cho at the time or had evidence that he was suicidal (like slashed wrists) he could have been committed and more properly evaluated. For better or worse, you can’t lock someone up just because they’re acting weird.

My late wife was (most likely) mentally ill. A few days before she died, her brother realized something was really wrong with her and took her into be evaluated. Though the person who evaluated her agreed there might be some mental health issues, he could find no reason to involuntarily commit her because she didn’t pose an immediate risk to herself or others.

The following weekend she killed herself.

After tragic events it’s easy to point fingers and with self-righteously proclaim, “You should have done something to stop this.”

Though there are times when people sit on their hands and do nothing to stop acts of evil, I don’t think that’s the case with my late wife or Cho.

I don’t hold the doctor or the mental health system responsible for my late wife’s suicide. I believe the shrink who evaluated my late wife did the best that he could under the circumstances. I’d probably say the same thing about the doctor who said Cho wasn’t an imminent threat – especially considering it took 17 months for him to pull off his murderous rampage.

Before the Virginia Tech shootings if Cho had involuntarily committed without proving he or she was some sort of threat to public safety, no doubt these same journalists who are wailing about our flawed mental health system would have been calling for due process and for him to be released. We would have watched or read stories about how most mentally ill aren’t a threat to anyone and how most of them can lead normal lives with the proper treatment. (All true, BTW).

Instead we’re treated to stories about how the mental system is broken and how this tragedy should have been prevented back in December of 2005.

I don’t know how to fix the system.

Maybe some sort of compromise plan can be reached where people are thoroughly evaluated for 48 hours to see if they’re really a threat before deciding whether to commit or release them.

In a free society there’s a fine line to walk between encroaching on someone’s liberties and public safety. These issues are debated all time when it comes to laws that have been passed to fight terrorism.

My personal opinion is that if someone is bent on killing others or committing other acts of evil, no law or mental health evaluation will stop them. They’ll figure out how to answer the questions and slip through the cracks and do whatever it is they want to do.

It’s not a fatalistic view, just one grounded in reality.

The best thing we can do is be vigilant. When we see friends or family behaving oddly or suspect their up to something, then we should take proper action instead of sitting on our hands.

While every act of evil or tragedy resulting form someone who’s not thinking clearly can’t be stopped, we can be watchful and observant and take action when it’s appropriate to do so.

Friday Afternoon

Marathon Girl: I set a new record on my eight mile run today! Me: Did you finally run it in under seven minutes per mile?

Marathon Girl: No. I received a total of seven catcalls.

Speech

If I have any fans in the utmost reaches of northern Utah, I’ll be giving a speech at the Producer Revolution forum in Logan, Utah Thursday, April 19 from 7:00-8:00 p.m.  The speech is open to the public and there is no cost to attend. The forum will be held at the Kimber Acadamy building at 3125 N. Main.

Most English Majors Aren't Evil

Dear News Media:  I don’t know why you're so obsessed with pointing out that the Virginia Tech killer, Seung-Hui Cho, was an English major unless it has to do with that violent stuff he wrote for a short story class.

One doesn't have to be an English major to be a writer or to even write disturbing one-act plays. Even non-English majors are capable of writing sick stuff and killing innocent people.

So you know, the majority of English majors are normal people who have a strange like to read and write. Some people would call us bookworms. Most of us have no desire to kill or harm others.

Thanks for listening,

Abel (An English major)

Random Thoughts April 2007

As a kid I never had allergies. Now that I’m an adult, I get them every spring. After five years of this you’d think I realized that be able to more quickly diagnose a stuffed up head as allergies instead of “a head cold that won’t go away.” Marathon Girl is always happier after long runs.

Chicago Jo’s recent marathon experience reminds me of my own experience and why I stick to short runs.   With two boys who always want to play with me as soon as I get home from work. One of their favorite activities is to have me swing them both around in my arms. I don’t know what I’m going to do once Molly gets old enough that she wants to play with dad too. Last time I checked, its impossible to grow a third arm.

Nothing makes my boys happier than taking them to the park.

Writing fiction is much more difficult than writing non-fiction. With non-fiction you already know what happened and simply have to artfully retell those events. With fiction, even if you know what you want to happen, sometimes you realize it’s not going to work and have to either rewrite an entire chapter or simply start over.

The bad thing about spring is that I have to start mowing the lawn again. I hate mowing the lawn even though I like the way a freshly mowed yard looks.

Why is it politicians want to bail out people who were stupid enough to take out mortgages they couldn’t afford? Do they really think that eliminating consequences for bad decisions will actually do these people any favors?

One of the people I admire is a sister-in-law who’s never afraid to do the right thing no matter what the consequences.

Sometimes I wonder if I’ll ever watch TV after LOST goes off the air. It’s going to take a show with excellent writing, strong characters, and a great plot to even make me consider trading my time for the boob tube. The good news is that LOST will be back for a fourth season.

I’ve noticed a lot more people wearing Detroit Tiger hats since they went to the World Series. My guess is I’ll be the only one claiming to be a Tiger fan if they tank this year.

I need more sleep. Six-and-a-half hours a night isn’t enough.

The one thing I wish I had more of was time. There’s just not enough of it to accomplish everything I want to do in a day.

And speaking of time, whoever returned my watch to the gym's lost and found has my eternal gratitude.

Now I'm It

Responding to Lisa’s tag... Three things that scare me: • The Ring movie • Those who blindly follow others • Media hysteria

Three people who make me laugh: • The Marx Brothers • My kids • Jon

Three things I love: • Writing • Reading • Running

Three things I hate: • Wasting time • Watching TV (except LOST) • Going a day without exercising

Three things I don't understand: • Why people go on killing sprees • Why it takes the state so damn long to build new roads or fix existing ones. • Hypocrites

Three things on my desk: • A stack of unread books • The latest issue of The New Yorker • Photos of my wife and kids

Three things I'm doing right now: • Blogging (duh) • Drinking lemonade • Writing a speech I’m giving Thrusday night

Three things I want to do before I die: • See my kids grow up and have kids • Publish all the novels that are bouncing around in my head • Meet Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clearance Thomas

Three things I can do: • Keep up with Marathon Girl on short runs • Ghostwrite books, essays, etc. • Read all day without getting tired

Three things I can't do: • Throw away books • Summersaults • Draw

Three things (or people) I think you should listen to: • Thomas Sowell • Matt Drudge • Books on tape (for long drives)

Three things (or people) you should never listen to: • Don Imus • Celebrities • Global Warming activists

Three things I'd like to learn: • Spanish (it’s more useful than Bulgarian) • How to cook Chinese food • How to change my car’s oil

Three favorite foods: • Meditranian Pizza • Marathon Girl’s fried chicken • Wheaties

Three shows I watched as a kid: • Battlestar Galactica • Alf • Knight Rider

Three things I regret: • This will all be detailed in my book, Room for Two.

Three people I tag:

• Mrs. Ronk • Scott • Jon 

Knowing When to Say Good-bye

Emilio Gonzales is terminally ill.

The 17-month-old boy has been diagnosed with Leigh’s disease – a rare illness that is characterized by degeneration of the central nervous system.

He’s been in a pediatric intensive care unit since December 28. According to doctors his condition is irreversible. He can’t breath on his own. He’s fed through a tube. He rarely opens his eyes. He does not have a gag reflex. He shows no real purposeful response or movement.

Without life support, Emilio would die.

Emilio is at the center of a growing controversy surrounding a 1999 Texas law that allows doctors and hospital administrators to decide when to end life-sustaining treatment in medically futile cases. If there’s no hope that a patient will recover, hospitals can give a 10-day notice to the family of their decision to discontinue care.

Even though the law’s been on the books for eight years, hospitals have rarely had to send notices because doctors and family members usually come to an agreement about when is the best time to end treatment.

However, Emilio’s mother, Catarina, doesn’t want life support removed without her consent. She says she understands the condition of her son and that one day she’ll have to say good-bye but wants to be the one to decide when her son’s life will end.

I feel for Catarina and the decision she’s facing. Taking a child off life support is the hardest, most difficult decision anyone can ever make.

Five years ago, my daughter, Hope, came into the world three months early. Though she wasn’t suffering from a disease like Emilio, she was dependant on a ventilator for breath, tubes for food, made no purposeful movements, and had no higher order brain functions. Four days after intensive testing by doctors and specialists, I was informed that Hope’s condition was irreversible.

Since Hope was too young to speak for herself, I was the one who had to make that life and death decision for her.

Coming to the conclusion to remove my daughter’s life support was utter hell.

On the outside Hope looked fine. She had ten fingers, ten toes. Her skin was a healthy pink color. Even though she was three months early, she had a thick mat of brown hair.

Inside, however, her body wasn’t working. His lungs couldn’t function. There was severe brain damage. Her nervous system was shot.

None of that mattered; not to me anyway. She was my daughter. And like any parent I was hoping for a miracle – one that, as it turned out, would never arrive.

Many agonizing days and sleepless nights passed before I came to the conclusion that being dependant on machines for basic life functions such as breathing, isn’t really a life. Lying in a hospital bed, unable to communicate with or even be aware of who was around you isn’t living. There was no chance that Hope would recover. She could never come home with me. Her life, so long as she lived, would be in a sterile hospital room surrounded by life giving machines.

I didn’t want my daughter to live like that.

Nine days after she arrived in this world, Hope was removed from life support and died in my arms.

I understand Catarina’s hesitancy to remove Emilio from life support. They’re the actions of a parent still holding out for a miracle. They’re the actions of a parent who’s not ready to say good-bye.

All life is precious but there comes a time when a life ceases to be worth continuing. Sadly, Emilio has reached that stage.

Catarina is right when she says the Texas law needs to be changed. Family members are the best ones to make the decision when or if to remove life support. No one – not doctors, nurses, or state legislators – should force their hand.

But she’s wrong to prolonging a life – and, possibly, the suffering – of her young son.

When another person’s life hangs in the balance, a choice must be made between selfish compassion and loving compassion. The only endurable and principled choice is love.

Loving compassion is choosing ‘right’ over ‘want.’ It is the willingness to take upon one’s self the extreme burden of life-and-death decisions for the benefit of the miserable, and to be willing to absorb the personal cost of anguish and heartache that follows. It might be said, “There is no greater love than a mother who lays down her heart for the sake of her child.”

If I could impart any words of advice to Catarina it would be this: let your son go to a better place. It’s the most loving thing you can do for him.

***

Enjoy what you read? Subscribe to the Abel Keogh email list. Be the first to learn about new essays, book updates, and other exclusive information.

This essay was originally published on FreeCapitalist.com. You can read all of Abel's FreeCapitalist essays here.