LOST Will End in 2010

So much of telling a story is knowing when to end the tale. It looks like the writers of LOST now know how long they have to conclude the tale of the survivors of Oceanic flight 815.

ABC announced Monday that it would air 16 uninterrupted episodes of "Lost" from February to May in 2008, 2009 and 2010.

The announcement came several months after executive producers Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, whose contracts were up this season, discussed publicly their wishes to negotiate a finite ending for their island mystery instead of letting the show stay on the air indefinitely and die unnoticed.

Overall I think this another groundbreaking move for the television show and a good one for the overall plot, story, and characters. The writers will now be able to carefully plan out the remainder of the story and not have it go on and on until it becomes a shell of it's former self a la The X-Files and Alias.

This does make me wonder if they're ever going to bring Walt back on the show. Say they bring him back in 2010 -- four years since we've last seen him. He'll probably be a foot taller and have a five o'clock shadow by them so it remains to be seen how the writers will deal with him (if he comes back) and all the other children on the island who age as well.

Should this prove to be a success, I wonder if we'll see more shows that follow a more compact season (16 episodes run back to back with no reruns). "24" has played around with the no rerun format with success though they run 24 episodes. If it works (read: television can come up with some quality programming) it means television networks could have a lineup that starts in August/September and a completely new one starting in January. Fox does this to some extent but with limited success. Not that it matters to me that much considering LOST is the only show I watch anyway. At least I get three more seasons of it.

The only downside I see to this new format is that after the season finale in three weeks, there will be a nine month hiatus until Season 4 begins.

I'm sure I'll live.

I'm just not sure how. :-)

***

For those who are interested, a preview of tonight's episode "The Man Behind the Curtain" can be seen here.

St. George Marathon Lottery

Wahooo! We just found out Marathon Girl made it through the St. George Marathon lottery and will be running it in October. This is a very scenic and fun marathon to run. Marathon Girl is thrilled to have the chance to run it again. Time to make hotel reservations.

Next by Michael Crichton

Michael Crichton’s one fault as a writer is that readers have a hard time caring about his characters. Rarely do the people in his novels have much depth beyond what it takes for them to move the plot along. This is unfortunate because Crichton is an imaginative storyteller who has some neat ideas for his books. Though his characters may not be complex or enduring, Crichton excels at writing about science and technology in clear, crisp, and understandable way that most writers would struggle with. He also excels at bringing to the forefront moral and ethical issues that new technology confronts people with and wrapping an intriguing story around these concerns.

In his latest novel, Next, Crichton explores the brave new world of genetics. Scientists are racing to patent different genes within the human genome as well as cells from ordinary people. There’s big dollars at stake in this game to come up with a breakthrough genetic discovery and people are willing to do just about anything to profit from it.

As scientists monkey around with splicing and dicing genes, trouble is bound to happen. A transgenic human-chimp named Dave is accidentally created along with a talking and math-loving parrot named Gerald -- who is the funniest and the most in-depth character in the entire novel. Defense attorneys blame the sexual attraction to young girls of their client on a recently discovered thrill-seeking gene.

Probably the most frightening aspect of Crichton’s novel takes place in regards to one’s own body. Under current law – and Crichton isn’t making this up – one’s blood samples and other cells that are given for testing purposes can legally be claimed discarded waste and sized via eminent domain by research universities. The university can then profit from their resulting products from tissue samples without ever compensating the person they were taken from. So much for the 13th Amendment. Crichton illustrates this well in a courtroom drama of a former leukemia patient whose cells contain a unique cancer fighting ability but loses the right to do with his cells as he pleases.

Though not one of his better books (Jurassic Park, State of Fear, and Prey are much better), Next is a fast-paced read and very thought provoking. It’s too bad we don’t care about the people in the story as much as we do about the possible moral questions and dilemmas that Crichton raises. But if you’re looking for an entertaining summer read, consider adding Next to your list.

LOST: The Brig

 

*** Spoiler Alert ***

Many, many episodes ago Marathon Girl made the connection that Locke’s father was the same person who was responsible for swindling Sawyer’s parents. (She has a talent for connecting the stories on LOST. I am envious.) So the big surprise in last night’s episode of LOST didn’t come as a big shock to either of us. Despite the fact we knew what was coming from the moment the episode started, it was still one of the better episodes this season.

What made the episode so great is that Locke finally reached that transformation he (and viewers) have been yearning for since LOST began. Locke’s wanted to be a leader and do things to help people. Unfortunately, he always seems to be suckered into other people’s con games. He’s the one other people use to accomplish their selfish means. We’ve always wanted Locke to overcome because it’s been painful at times to watch him fail time and time again.

Finally, Locke was able to reverse the situation. He was able to get Sawyer (the island’s con man, of all people) to do something he couldn’t do himself. When Sawyer killed his father Locke not only got his father out of his life but proved to himself that he doesn’t have to be the sucker anymore. Locke’s transformation was similar to what Hurley went through earlier this season when he realized he wasn’t a big bad luck charm. (The big difference begin that Hurley’s transformation was funny and lighthearted. Locke’s was dark and disturbing.)

And now Locke’s headed back to the Others to take on Ben – the island’s other great manipulator. The mind games they’re going to play on each other are going to be fun to watch. Let’s hope Locke comes out the victor.

Locke and Cooper

TV Ratings

There is some fairly strong buzz about tonight’s episode of LOST. According to one reviewer this latest installment “leads to one of the show's darkest and most morally complex outings yet, one few other shows would dare to attempt.” Hopefully it lives up to the buzz. Interestingly there’s been some worry about declining audience for LOST and other popular television shows. Television executives are scrambling to find ways to attract more viewers.  But when you count the people who record the show and watch it later, the ratings for most shows are much higher. The ratings for LOST, for example, are up 24 percent when you count the number of people who record the show and watch it within seven days.

The real issue is that TV has become much more on demand the last two years. You can buy episodes off the internet, watch them on the web, or record them and watch them at your convenience. Yet TV studios haven’t changed the way they count the number of views. If you don’t watch the show when it’s broadcast, you don’t count.

I don’t have a solution to the problem but TV execs better way to report how many people are actually watching the shows and television networks need to find more creative ways to address the concerns of advertisers. It’s another example of old media struggling to adjust to a changing environment. (The same problem is faced with newspapers that have declining print circulations but usually a booming number of online viewers.)

I wouldn’t be surprised if the networks come up with a new way to count viewers in the next year or two and find a way to make those who are digitally recording shows have to watch a 30 second commercial or something (kind of what they do when you watch a show online) before you can watch the show.

And for those who want a 90 second peak of tonight’s episode of LOST, you can watch a clip here.

The Great College Lie

If you want to be successful you need to go to college. Without a college degree you’re destined to work at an unsatisfying, low paying job the rest of your life and will never be able to live the American Dream. Does that advice sound familiar? It should.

That’s the mantra of success preached from the time our children enter school. They’re told that a college education will be the best investment they can ever make. Educators tell them if they don’t have a college degree, they’ll end up digging ditches or performing other menial jobs and live in poverty and misery for the rest of their lives.

Parents reinforce this message by prodding their children to get good grades so a university will give them a scholarship. Popular entertainment depicts numerous stories of a brilliant kid growing up in a working class neighborhood with less-than-successful parents who tell their kid the only way out of the hell hole is to go to college.

The problem with this assumption is that it’s wrong.

A college degree does not ensure that anyone will be successful or have a comfortable lifestyle. Conversely the absence of a degree does not mean that one is destined to low-paying, menial work. Yet the importance of a college education has been drilled in our heads often enough that seven out of ten high school students will enroll in college not because it’s in their best interest to do so, but because they’ve been told (and in some cases pressured) by parents, educators, and councilors that college is the only way to obtain the American Dream.

This advice is often backed up with the statistics that show that college graduates earn more over their lifetime than their non-college counterparts. Pope Center Researcher George Leef notes in The Overselling of Higher Education, such statistics are not only misleading but assume that those without college degrees would secure better, higher-paying employment if they obtained a college degree. Leef writes:

Instead of looking at average earnings for each group – which inflates the earnings of the college-educated by including many fabulously wealthy professionals and business executives, while depressing the earnings of those without college degrees by including many individual who are scarcely literate – it is more sensible to focus on the workers at the margin. The right question to ask is this: For high school graduates who might have gone to college but did not, is it the case that their earnings would be significantly higher if they had instead enrolled in college?

Leef concludes that students who decide not to attend college are better off not going because they can hone their skills in a non-college environment as opposed to wasting their time doing things such as studying or writing papers when their interests do not lie in that direction.

Even among those with college degrees a well-paying, satisfying job never materializes. Again Leef writes that many college graduates find themselves with no marketable skills upon graduation and only marginally employed.

Services must be rendered. Some of those jobs demand a high degree of knowledge and skill, but most don’t. With burgeoning numbers of college graduates, we should not be surprised to find that many of them – especially those who obtained easy, low-effort degrees in soft subjects – can do no better in the job market than delivering pizza, selling coffee, or taking theater tickets.

No doubt many of these people are disillusioned after being told that their college degree was their ticket to success.

Not everyone is college material. This isn’t a bad thing. Just because someone opts not to attend college doesn’t mean they’re stupid or unable to become successful. Yet we tend to look down upon those who haven’t jumped through enough hoops to obtain a college degree. Someone may be able to understand the complexities of an automobile and quickly diagnose and fix the problem but because they have a technical certificate rather than a college diploma, we don’t view them as intelligent or successful as someone who works in a small cubicle staring at a computer screen all day.

This condescending view of some professions has led to the gradual decline in interest in technical training and a void in such professions as auto and aviation mechanics, electronics, and trades such as construction.

Fortunately, vocational schools and other training have received somewhat of a resurgence in popularity. And they’re focusing on more forward-looking careers than their traditional wood or metal shop days. Technical education can now provide careers in high demand and specialized fields like robotics, 3-D animation, and industrial maintenance technology. Many of these jobs pay very well. The Christian Science Monitor tells the story of a savvy student who pursued specialized computer classes in high school and landed a $52,000 a year after graduation. The student is doing something that he loves and being paid well to do it. No college degree required.

We do our children a profound a disservice when we reflexively assume that college is the only way to achieve success. Rather, parents and educators should help children and students focus on their interests, talents, and unique abilities in order to decide what kind of post-high school education would be most beneficial. College is a good path for many people, but others would be much better off attending a vocational school, learning a trade, or starting their own business.

Continually obtaining knowledge and skills are important and necessary to do what we love with our lives and to provide for ourselves and families – if we have them. But assuming the only way to obtain success is through college merely encourages many young adults to waste years of their life pursuing something that will ultimately be of no benefit to them.

Death Warmed Over

Is it just me, or is Phil Spector one creepy looking dude?

I thought when you went on trail it was the job of lawyers to make you look presentable so the jury wouldn’t judge you by your looks. Maybe they thought the big hair he used to have was a big distraction. His new look is something between death warmed over and the Emperor from Star Wars with a girlish haircut.

Were I on the jury I’d be tempted to vote to convict just on the fact his new look makes him look like a creepy killer. His big hair, although weird, at least seemd to fit the image of musician/songwriter/record producer -- not a killer.

LOST: D.O.C

 

*** Spoiler Alert ***

Did anyone really thing that Sun was carrying someone other than Jin’s baby? If women who conceive off the island live, then where’s the tension about wondering when Sun’s going to die? And having viewers wonder what’s going to happen to Sun is much more dramatic then seeing how Jin would react to Sun telling him that the baby wasn’t his. Now the writers have something they can tease not only through the end of this season but probably through most of Season 4 too.

Sun and Jin’s flashbacks are still my favorite. To me their relationship has the most depth and emotion off all characters on the island. They could do a whole spin-off series on them before they came to the island which I think would be absolutely fascinating. The writers do a great job making their characters real and believable.

In an episode that was full of three twists, I think the biggest one was the fact that Mikhail (eye patch guy) was still alive. Maybe he knew the sonic barrier wouldn’t kill him and that was part of the reason he thanked Locke for pushing him into it. Now that I think about it, his body wasn’t lying around when Kate and Juliet fended off the smoke monster a couple of episodes back. (And speaking of the smoke monster, Vickie asked a couple weeks ago why the smoke monster couldn’t just go over the sonic barrier fence. If you listen to the official LOST podcast from April 16 the executive producers hint that the smoke monster can’t leave the ground through they didn’t explain any more than that.)

In any case I think the eye patch guy is going to play a major role in future episodes. And I have a good idea where he was going at the end of the episode. While helping save Naomi’s (the parachute lady) life she said something that Mikhail incorrectly translated at “Thank you for saving my life.” According to one source she was speaking Portuguese with a Brazilian accent really saying “I am not alone” or “I’m not the only one.” Dollars for doughnuts he’s off to find the other person who was accompanying her. (Penny, perhaps?)

As for why she believes no one survived Oceanic flight 815 – well that’s a puzzle I’d really like to know the answer.

Season 3 is getting better and better. I’m really looking forward to the remaining episodes.

Stopping Acts of Evil

It’s been interesting to watch the “astonishment” and “outrage” of journalists once the learned the State of Virginia couldn’t force Seung-Hui Cho to receive treatment until he hurt himself or someone else. They generally seem to be of the same opinion that something should have been done 17 months ago that might have prevented the slaying of 32 people. Well something was done.

A few Virginia Tech students and faculty tried to intervene on Cho's behalf 17 months ago, when they reported incidents of stalking, bizarre classroom behavior and a threat of suicide to campus police. Virginia Tech security took Cho, voluntarily, to an off-campus mental health agency. A counselor there recommended commitment and a temporary detention order was signed, indicating that Cho presented an "imminent danger" to himself.

According to official court documents, however, after evaluation at Carilion St. Albans Psychiatric Hospital, a doctor wrote that Cho, although mentally ill, "denies suicidal ideation (and) does not acknowledge symptoms of a thought disorder."

Under Virginia law, anyone seeking to forcibly commit someone to a psychiatric facility must appear before a special justice. Because St. Albans did not believe Cho presented an imminent danger, the magistrate declined to commit the Virginia Tech English major, and he was released with the understanding he would get outpatient treatment.

Maybe if they had found a gun on Cho at the time or had evidence that he was suicidal (like slashed wrists) he could have been committed and more properly evaluated. For better or worse, you can’t lock someone up just because they’re acting weird.

My late wife was (most likely) mentally ill. A few days before she died, her brother realized something was really wrong with her and took her into be evaluated. Though the person who evaluated her agreed there might be some mental health issues, he could find no reason to involuntarily commit her because she didn’t pose an immediate risk to herself or others.

The following weekend she killed herself.

After tragic events it’s easy to point fingers and with self-righteously proclaim, “You should have done something to stop this.”

Though there are times when people sit on their hands and do nothing to stop acts of evil, I don’t think that’s the case with my late wife or Cho.

I don’t hold the doctor or the mental health system responsible for my late wife’s suicide. I believe the shrink who evaluated my late wife did the best that he could under the circumstances. I’d probably say the same thing about the doctor who said Cho wasn’t an imminent threat – especially considering it took 17 months for him to pull off his murderous rampage.

Before the Virginia Tech shootings if Cho had involuntarily committed without proving he or she was some sort of threat to public safety, no doubt these same journalists who are wailing about our flawed mental health system would have been calling for due process and for him to be released. We would have watched or read stories about how most mentally ill aren’t a threat to anyone and how most of them can lead normal lives with the proper treatment. (All true, BTW).

Instead we’re treated to stories about how the mental system is broken and how this tragedy should have been prevented back in December of 2005.

I don’t know how to fix the system.

Maybe some sort of compromise plan can be reached where people are thoroughly evaluated for 48 hours to see if they’re really a threat before deciding whether to commit or release them.

In a free society there’s a fine line to walk between encroaching on someone’s liberties and public safety. These issues are debated all time when it comes to laws that have been passed to fight terrorism.

My personal opinion is that if someone is bent on killing others or committing other acts of evil, no law or mental health evaluation will stop them. They’ll figure out how to answer the questions and slip through the cracks and do whatever it is they want to do.

It’s not a fatalistic view, just one grounded in reality.

The best thing we can do is be vigilant. When we see friends or family behaving oddly or suspect their up to something, then we should take proper action instead of sitting on our hands.

While every act of evil or tragedy resulting form someone who’s not thinking clearly can’t be stopped, we can be watchful and observant and take action when it’s appropriate to do so.

Friday Afternoon

Marathon Girl: I set a new record on my eight mile run today! Me: Did you finally run it in under seven minutes per mile?

Marathon Girl: No. I received a total of seven catcalls.